The Supreme Court on Monday, April 7, allowed the Trump administration to use an 18Th-The law of the century in time of war to deport Venezuelan migrants, but said they must obtain a judicial hearing before they are tasks from the United States. In a bitterly divided decision, the court said the administration must give Venezuelans who claim that they are gang members “reasonable time” to go to court. But the conservative majority said that legal challenges must take place in Texas, instead of a Washington court room.
In dissent, the three liberal judges said the administration has tried to avoid judicial review in this case and the court “now rewards the government for their behavior.” Judge Amy Coney Barrett joined part of the dissent. The judges acted in the emergency appeal of the administration after the Federal Court of Appeals in Washington left an order that temporarily prohibits the deportations of migrants accused of being gang members under the law of alien enemies rarely used.
“In spite of all the rhetoric of the dissidents,” the court wrote in an unmarked opinion, the order of the Superior Court confirms “that the detainees subject to elimination orders under the AEA have the right to leave and the opportunity to challenge their elimination.”
The case has become an inflammation point in the midst of a growing tension between the White House and federal courses.
‘A historical victory for the rule of law’
Attorney General Pam Bondi described the Court’s ruling “a historical victory for the rule of law.” “An activist judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction to take control of President Trump’s authority to carry out foreign policy and keep American people safe,” Bondi wrote in a publication on social networks.
The original order that blocks deportations to El Salvador was issued by the United States District Judge, James E. Boasberg, the federal court judge in Washington.
President Donald Trump invoked Alien enemies law from War II to justify the deportation of subsids of persons under a presidential proclamation by calling the train gang of Aragua and the invasive force.
The lawyers of the American Union of Civil Liberties filed the lawsuit on behalf of five non -Venezuelan citizens who were detained in Texas, hours after the proclamation was made public and, as the immigration authorities, they walked hundreds of migrants to aircraft waiting.
Partners Service
Learn French with gymshmer
Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day.
Free test
Boasberg imposed a high temporal in deportations and also ordered Venezuelan planets or immigrants to return to the United States. That did not happen. The judge held a hearing last week on whether the government challenged its order to change the planes. The administration has invoked a “privilege of state secrets” and refused to give Boasberg any additional information about deportations.
Trump and his allies have asked to accuse Boasberg. In a rare statement, the president of the Supreme Court John Roberts said that “the political trial is not an appropriate response to the disagreement of a judicial decision.”
]
