YoIn his inaugural speech on January 20, Donald Trump announced that under his presidency, “the United States will once again be considered a growing nation, one that (…) expands our territory (…) and carries. With these words, the US president developed his own vision of manifesto destiny. To the original idea that the US nation has a divine mission for global expansion, the new concept of the White House A concept of a large amount of what it is, what is it about, what it is about, what do you consult?
In this context, three territories have repeatedly led the objectives of their expansionist objectives. The first is Canada, for which he has continuously proclaimed his destination to become 51stem American state. The second is the Panama Canal, which Hey has declared to “recover.” The third is Greenland, a territory under Danish Sovereigtty, about what he told NBC on March 30: “We will get Greenland. Yes, 100%”, before adding: “There is a good possibility that we can do it [this annexation] Without military force “, but” I don’t take anything from the table. “
Among these three objectives, President Trump and his advisors consider that Greenland, due to his internal political situation and the nature of this territory, is the most vulnerable dam. While the White House works on stage for the bars control of this island, let’s not have illusions: the era of the verbal and verbal provocations of the Trump’s first term is behind us. We have entered a phase in which every day we bring us closer to what could be the annexation of the United States of a territory belonging to a Member State of the European Union.
Guilty passivity
If such annexation occurred, it could mark the death of the organization of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO). How can we imagine the survival of a military alliance in which the main power has assumed the territory of another member? How can we imagine that trusted bonds would remain throughout the Atlantic when the United States had violated the Sovereign of Denmark, an ally that has paid the heaviest price in Afghanistan in relation to its population?
He has 58.82% of this article to read. The rest is only for subscribers.
]
